HOME
Bait&Tackle
Bed&Breakfast
Boat Rentals
Campgrounds
Contact Us
Cottage Rentals
Guides/Fishing Charters
Hotels/Motels
Hunting Supplies
Ice Huts/Ice Guides
Marinas
Outfitters
QUINTE FISHING SERIES
Resorts
Tourism
Trailer Parks
Launches
 

Quinte Fishing

Fishing Reports for the Bay of Quinte
It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 6:28 pm
banner ad

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 200kHz vs. 83kHz
PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:52 pm 
Offline
Walleye Master

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:05 pm
Posts: 1985
Just curious what beam you guys select on your sonar units for different situations. Shallow water, deep water etc... Any other factors that would make you switch from narrow beam to wide beam??

Thanks

_________________
There's something wrong with that rod.
It has a bend in it!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 200kHz vs. 83kHz
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:14 am 
Offline
Walleye Catcher

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 1:31 pm
Posts: 436
I have found that 200kHz is the best all around for shallower water (60' or less) as it offers the best detail for bottom structure and marking fish in those depths.

I don't experiment too much with 83kHz because in the type of fishing I do is always less than 60' and 200kHz works so well.

83kHz is a wider beam so in deeper depths and when downrigging is involved a lot of anglers like the 83 better.

Start with 200kHz and then experiment from there. 200 in narrower, but you'll see more detailed bottom structure. 83 is wider, but less detailed for bottom structure, but you may mark more fish with 83 because it is wider. I don't think there is a right or wrong situation to use either it comes down to personal preference.

Hopefully some of the deeper water fishermen will chime in with what works for them

-Lawren

_________________
Radioworld 4335 Steeles Ave W, Toronto, Ontario M3N 1V7 - www.radioworld.ca

Check out our blog at www.blog.radioworld.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 200kHz vs. 83kHz
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 11:25 am 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:18 am
Posts: 231
Interesting points Lawren, and I will defer to your expertise but I always thought of it the other way, especially when icefishing. I use the narrow beam deep and the wide beam shallow. For open water fishing I just keep it on dual mode.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 200kHz vs. 83kHz
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:43 pm 
Offline
Walleye Catcher

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 1:31 pm
Posts: 436
jjz you are dead on when it comes to ice fishing...however in a boat most anglers do the opposite. I think a lot has to do with the fact that marking your lure in deeper water is very important while ice fishing. By using the narrow cone the power is concentrated directly below the hole and therefore making it easier to mark your lure. When using a wide cone you'll still mark your lure, but what will happen is that your bottom coverage will increase dramatically. And like I said it comes down to personal preference if what you do helps you catch fish keep doing it!

Here is a good article that explains cone angles well http://vexilar.com/info/choosing-a-tran ... m-angle-2/

-Lawren

_________________
Radioworld 4335 Steeles Ave W, Toronto, Ontario M3N 1V7 - www.radioworld.ca

Check out our blog at www.blog.radioworld.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 200kHz vs. 83kHz
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:06 pm 
Offline
Walleye Catcher

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 1:31 pm
Posts: 436
Here is another one that is a good read http://vexilar.com/info/how-sonar-works-article/

_________________
Radioworld 4335 Steeles Ave W, Toronto, Ontario M3N 1V7 - www.radioworld.ca

Check out our blog at www.blog.radioworld.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 200kHz vs. 83kHz
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 4:39 pm 
Offline
Walleye Master

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:05 pm
Posts: 1985
Thanks guys. I typically fish in 20 FOW or less, so I'm always on 200. I'm going to be doing some deep water fishing soon so I'm not to concerned about bottom structure, as the fish I'm targeting will be suspended so I think the wide beam may be more useful.

_________________
There's something wrong with that rod.
It has a bend in it!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
banner ad


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 134 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group