HOME
Bait&Tackle
Bed&Breakfast
Boat Rentals
Campgrounds
Contact Us
Cottage Rentals
Guides/Fishing Charters
Hotels/Motels
Hunting Supplies
Ice Huts/Ice Guides
Marinas
Outfitters
QUINTE FISHING SERIES
Resorts
Tourism
Trailer Parks
Launches
 

Quinte Fishing

Fishing Reports for the Bay of Quinte
It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 9:26 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours




banner ad
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 9:12 pm 
Offline
Walleye

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 10:11 pm
Posts: 120
Are there any bylaws against fishing here if you are in a boat? I had assumed since it was private/municipal property they can enforce no fishing bylaws from land/dock but do municipalities also have the ability to enforce bylaws like no fishing in the harbour if you access the harbours waters from the bay?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 7:15 am 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:05 am
Posts: 235
Ive seen lots of people fishing the harbor and have never seen them get in trouble. I don't believe its posted as no fishing..


Top
 Profile  
 
banner ad
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 7:17 am 
Offline
Walleye Wisdom

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 6:53 pm
Posts: 842
Bylaws are enforceable within the boundries of the municipality. They're not limited by how you get there.

A persons opinion on matters of law are only valid if the Judge agrees. Usually, when the Judge says your wrong, the guy who gave you the opinion isn't standing beside you.

The City website says that Victoria Harbour is home to the Bay of Quinte Yatch Club. If your going into someones home, it's best to have permission. Here's the number 613-966-5931.


Top
 Profile  
 
banner ad
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 4:05 pm 
Offline
Walleye

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 10:11 pm
Posts: 120
The land is city property but the water it is surrounded by should be federally owned. It is the same as a home owner saying u cant fish in front of their dock because it is private property. I could care less if I cant fish there but I was just curious.


Top
 Profile  
 
banner ad
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 6:04 pm 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:07 pm
Posts: 377
Location: COBOURG
Cobourg Town Council looked into this matter in regards to its Harbour, after this video a few years back .They found they didn't have jurisdiction ,....therefore, the fishermen were within their rights to be there,at least then. dont know if anything changed since then

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=co ... ORM=VRDGAR


Top
 Profile  
 
banner ad
PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 10:19 am 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 7:26 pm
Posts: 221
Location: Peterborough
joey wrote:
The land is city property but the water it is surrounded by should be federally owned. It is the same as a home owner saying u cant fish in front of their dock because it is private property. I could care less if I cant fish there but I was just curious.



The water bed is actually owned by the city of belleville, and they could impose no fishing if they chose to. The rest of the lake bed is provincial not federal and it isn't until after hgwy 62 that is provincial again.

_________________
Cheers,



"I would never lie. I willfully participate in a campaign of misinformation"


Top
 Profile  
 
banner ad
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:20 pm 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 2:11 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Kingston
Swiftdeer wrote:
joey wrote:
The land is city property but the water it is surrounded by should be federally owned. It is the same as a home owner saying u cant fish in front of their dock because it is private property. I could care less if I cant fish there but I was just curious.



The water bed is actually owned by the city of belleville, and they could impose no fishing if they chose to. The rest of the lake bed is provincial not federal and it isn't until after hgwy 62 that is provincial again.
Where are you getting this info?
My understanding is that all navigatable water falls under federal jurisdiction except for a very few areas. Lk O is definately federal...

_________________
"I know exactly where the fish are. I marked it on the bottom of me boat!"


Top
 Profile  
 
banner ad
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 9:11 am 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 7:26 pm
Posts: 221
Location: Peterborough
Bobber wrote:
Swiftdeer wrote:
joey wrote:
The land is city property but the water it is surrounded by should be federally owned. It is the same as a home owner saying u cant fish in front of their dock because it is private property. I could care less if I cant fish there but I was just curious.



The water bed is actually owned by the city of belleville, and they could impose no fishing if they chose to. The rest of the lake bed is provincial not federal and it isn't until after hgwy 62 that is provincial again.
Where are you getting this info?
My understanding is that all navigatable water falls under federal jurisdiction except for a very few areas. Lk O is definately federal...



Lake Ontario is actually provincial. TheTrent Severn waterway to dam 1 and the Rideau are federal, and the st. lawrence seaway... but the rest and all inland water bodies are provincial- well until you cross the border then I really don't know. Some landlocked lakes that are completely surrounded by private property may be private, but usually these are small waterbodies.

_________________
Cheers,



"I would never lie. I willfully participate in a campaign of misinformation"


Top
 Profile  
 
banner ad
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
banner ad


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 122 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group