I admire your intent. I trully do and agree........but
The current set of conditions across the province of Ont. will not see that happen. However logical it may be....this is not in the cards in the forseeable future.
There is however, some unique regional opportunities with the right staff, politicans involved. (These are very few and far between regarding the opporunities). All sectors including native, commercial and rec. angling interests have to be met in some fashion.
Supportable options, realistic alternatives must be, and are the only course of action worth requesting pursuing imo. that will produce results. Momentum, timing, policy and politics all come into play (I know young man....it sucks).
Going full circle now.... there remains an opportunity (the only viable one imo) for a sharp, well thought out removal of 99.9% of all gill nets in BOQ.
The support of the public in all quarters appear to be there. The backbone or push to secure any result is leadership that has the street wherewithall, business background, relationships with all sectors to make it happen.
This is not a style of leadership, person that one will find within most beaurocratic rank and file staff. They are there but most become way too frazzled........
Estimated time imo to plan and make it in the realm of possibility- 1.5-2yrs.
* cost- staff, operation - $300,000 - 450,000+ (inclusive of travel, public meetings, support material, advertisements, etc.); this is assuming that it is in the realm of possibility to have an independent (totally) that can handpick at least 3 MNR staff (1 tech, 1 bio, outside support staff; not included in budget)
* revised cost of actual implementation- $2,000,000 - this is for buyouts on a number of fronts; it must be attractive to buy or grandfather any commercial, native commercial gill nets; live release or impoundment gear is the only thing that should be allowed in a small body of water/ medium sized ecosystem like BOQ.
** Contingency fund- $300,000- this is litsed to cover any unforseen expences given that anyone capeable would expect silent but real resistence and might have something unforeseen. In a perfect world....I would personally have it publically donated back to local resource, grassroots groups on behalf of the taxpayer, angling public. Hopefully this would not be needed....but I fully imagine it would come into play.
This was an interesting thread. Thanks to the person that began to question, as to why no one responded. I encourage comments, both good and bad.
My part here is complete for now.
ODG