HOME
Bait&Tackle
Bed&Breakfast
Boat Rentals
Campgrounds
Contact Us
Cottage Rentals
Guides/Fishing Charters
Hotels/Motels
Hunting Supplies
Ice Huts/Ice Guides
Marinas
Outfitters
QUINTE FISHING SERIES
Resorts
Tourism
Trailer Parks
Launches
 

Quinte Fishing

Fishing Reports for the Bay of Quinte
It is currently Thu Nov 14, 2024 10:50 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours




banner ad
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:07 pm 
Offline
Walleye Wisdom
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2002 7:41 pm
Posts: 789
Location: Belleville Ontario
Guys,

I am not sure where you are getting the MNR stocking reports, but I think you are being mislead. My neighbour was talking to the area biologist that has been looking after Louborough. She indicated that 8,000 lake trout were planted in 2010. They have been planting fish in the lake every couple years since 2002. Almost all of the fish caught are stocked fish with either a pectoral or adipose fin clipped. The MNR can tell you when the fish you caught was stocked.

I was out on the lake earlier this week and ended up catching 2 smelt around 6-7 inches long. When I caught them, my Vexilar screen showed a school of bait 20 feet high. The lake trout were also in the area. We caught a few fish between 3-6 lbs and they appeared healthier than fish I have caught the last two previous years. Yes, two years ago the fish looked like they were death warmed over.

Personally, I think the smelt population has gone up recently, for some reason. Must be one of those 7 yr phase things, that happens in nature.

Also, When you clean a trout, you also find 2 or 3 smelt in each fish.

I'm still trying to find a good recipe for these trout, that doesn't involve cooking them on a ceder plank, then eating the plank and throwing out the fish. Just kidding. I make fish cakes and I can cough them down. LOL

Good fishing,
BATMAN 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:28 pm 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:56 pm
Posts: 330
Location: Kingston
The person I talked to was Monique Clarette (sorry if I spelled it wrong). She works at the Kingston MNR branch. I will have to go back and find her email.

The reason I emailed her was because we were catching trout without clipped fins....these fish have came from stockers that have successfully spawned.

She also told me they have done shoal work in the lake in the past few years with the hopes of reproducing trout.

I'm in the process of going back and finding this email. I talked with her on multiple occasions over the phone, prior to her sending me the "clip list".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:36 am 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 10:32 am
Posts: 216
I do not believe it is intended to fish the lake out. The open season was created to give locals a lake to fish legaly so as to protect the other lakes which do have sustainable lake trout with natural reproduction. Loborough does not have much if any natural reproduction as there is to much pollution in the lake from the numerous cottages with aging septics on the lake. Part of the problem has been the decline of the smelt population in the lake, again from pollution which has caused the lake trout to seek out new food items, and yes some of this has been plastics. This is why the ministry has suspended stocking to see if the smelt come back, and I believe if this happens they will continue with the stocking.One good note is that we have cought and had several fish cough up smelt after being cought this year which hopefully indicates they may be bouncing back. But fishing has been great this year I have landed well over 40 fish and for the most part they have appeared much healthier then years past. And to those of you who may question how may I have kept the answer is 3 just to try them to see if the poor eating quality had gotten any better, my feeling is still no and will continue to release all my fish. Good fishing.

Gord


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:00 pm 
Offline
Walleye
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:27 pm
Posts: 118
Gord, where's a good spot to walk out? Looking to take my nephew out this week since i've got a few days off work. How's the ice?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:52 pm 
Offline
Walleye Wisdom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:03 am
Posts: 503
Location: Seeley's Bay
Hey Gord:

That jives with what I have seen out there. Smelt population seemed to crash about 4 years ago, we used to go get few, but stopped when we wern't seeing much of a run. Then all the lakers you caught were eating shad instead of the preferred smelt. Then the shad numbers seemed to drop as well. We used to cruze the break on the west basin looking for the big schools of shad busting the surface, then pound the smallmouth on topwaters. That has not been as successfull over the last few years as well, as we were seeing fewer baitfish. I will agree this last year has been better, we saw some smelt in the spring (just looked), more schools of shad in the summer, and healthier looking lakers. Hopefully things are rebounding, and I know efforts are taking place to help identify sources of polution in the lake and get substandard septic systems replaced.

Right now my attitude is wait and see, so my Loughborough fish are all goin back unless mortally hooked. Good luck out there.

_________________
Bruce Ogilvie

"Fish Hard, Hunt Hard, Live Hard"

http://www.muskiescanada.ca/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:10 am 
Offline
Baitfish

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:32 am
Posts: 22
FishNGolfPRO wrote:
I'm not going to say every trout I've cleaned out of loughby has had rubber in it, but a GOOD majority have.

Couple things as I was in touch with the MNR near the end of last winter.

They stopped stocking loughborough with trout either 2 years ago or it might have been even 3. I got the impression that they are not happy with the trout that are in the lake and the reason it was opened year round was to fish it out.

Also heard rumblings of the possibility of walleye introduced in the near future?

The trout in Loughborough are very long and skinny forsure, IMO not the greatest tasting fish, we starting letting alot of them go.


There was talk of stocking Walleye, but it's not going to happen. A bad idea to mess with this lake which already has excellent bass and trout,
Fishing Fanatic


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:34 pm 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:56 pm
Posts: 330
Location: Kingston
had2lose wrote:
Gord, where's a good spot to walk out? Looking to take my nephew out this week since i've got a few days off work. How's the ice?



Brad - I'd love to take you out. I'll be hitting Loughby March 2 onwards. 10 fish days per person are common. I practice catch and release, and keep my 2 if only nec.

PM if you want to come down and fish dude.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:47 pm 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:18 am
Posts: 231
FishNGolfPRO wrote:
I'm not going to say every trout I've cleaned out of loughby has had rubber in it, but a GOOD majority have.

Couple things as I was in touch with the MNR near the end of last winter.

They stopped stocking loughborough with trout either 2 years ago or it might have been even 3. I got the impression that they are not happy with the trout that are in the lake and the reason it was opened year round was to fish it out.

Also heard rumblings of the possibility of walleye introduced in the near future?

The trout in Loughborough are very long and skinny forsure, IMO not the greatest tasting fish, we starting letting alot of them go.

I got the stocking list for this year and they are still stocking loughborough but it has been reduced by 50%, apparently they want to give the baitfish population a chance to recover. there will be less lakers but they will be more healthy looking. Walleye? That would be awesome but I hadn't heard that, only rumour I heard was they might be stocking whitefish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:52 pm 
Offline
Walleye Wisdom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:03 am
Posts: 503
Location: Seeley's Bay
i haven't been able to find the local stocking list. Any chance you could post it jjz?? I'm sure others would like it as well. Thanks.

_________________
Bruce Ogilvie

"Fish Hard, Hunt Hard, Live Hard"

http://www.muskiescanada.ca/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:11 pm 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Posts: 251
Location: Kingston
From what I have heard, the talk of stocking Walleye in here is just a rumour. Its a good lake to fish as is, no need to screw it up by creating more competition for bait fish.

As for ice fishing, got on the ice only once so far, saw 7 caught in under an hour (none by me). White jigs and smelt on gorge hooks seemed to be the key. 113 FOW on the flasher.

_________________
Give a man a fish & he'll eat for a day ...
Teach a man to fish & he'll be broke for life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:25 pm 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Posts: 251
Location: Kingston
i was on loughboroughlake.org and looked at a couple news letters. Looks like the dumped 15,000 fingerlings in back in 2008, and I found 8000 being put in the lake on May 10 according to the 2010 newsletter. Looks like they are slowing down the numbers. Used to be at 40,000 a year.

_________________
Give a man a fish & he'll eat for a day ...
Teach a man to fish & he'll be broke for life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 8:37 am 
Offline
Walleye Fry

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:03 pm
Posts: 61
Location: Kingston
The walleye wasn't a rumour, white lake fish hatchery had the walleye for the lake until the local residents put an end to that in fear of the lake getting even more traffic and fishing pressure than it already has.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 8:40 am 
Offline
Walleye Catcher
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:25 am
Posts: 498
Location: Amherst Island
Haven't found a recent one but this one covers to 2008.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:54 am 
Offline
Walleye Angler

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:18 am
Posts: 231
Dog Lake wrote:
i haven't been able to find the local stocking list. Any chance you could post it jjz?? I'm sure others would like it as well. Thanks.


Here you go...


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughborough Help
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:43 pm 
Offline
Walleye Wisdom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:03 am
Posts: 503
Location: Seeley's Bay
Thanks. Much appreciated.

_________________
Bruce Ogilvie

"Fish Hard, Hunt Hard, Live Hard"

http://www.muskiescanada.ca/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
banner ad

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group